Team Kangana Ranaut calls Taapsee Pannu ‘chaploos’ after digging out old interviews of latter on nepotism

Kangana Ranaut’s team has yet again taken a dig at Taapsee Pannu over ‘nepotism’. We all know that ‘nepotism’ debate started with Kangana a few years back and now after Sushant Singh Rajput’s death, it again got triggered. Kangana has been speaking upfront now like she used to do before and has called out the movie mafia of the industry.

The team has dug old interviews of Taapsee Pannu, where she had contradicted Kangana’s claims of the existence of nepotism in Bollywood. Sharing the screenshots of the old interviews of Taapsee, team Kangana wrote, “Many chaploos outsiders consistently try to derail d movements started by Kangana,dey want to b in movie mafia good books,dey gt movies & awards fr attacking Kangana & dey take part in open harassment f a woman,shame on u
@taapsee u reap the fruits f hr struggles bt gang up on hr(sic)”.

Check the tweet here.

Many chaploos outsiders consistently try to derail d movements started by Kangana,dey want to b in movie mafia good books,dey gt movies & awards fr attacking Kangana & dey take part in open harassment f a woman,shame on u @taapsee u reap the fruits f hr struggles bt gang up on hr https://t.co/0XZqVLsPok

— Team Kangana Ranaut (@KanganaTeam) July 4, 2020

The headlines of Taapsee’s interviews read: “You can’t blame nepotism for not getting work,” and “Outsiders don’t feel the step-motherly attitude anymore.”

Earlier, Taapsee and Kangana’s sister Rangoli Chandel grabbed the headlines for the movie ‘Judgementall Hai Kya’. Rangoli was not happy to see that Taapsee missed mentioning Kangana’s name in her tweet while praising the trailer of the movie. It all started from there and when ‘Saand Ki Aankh’s trailer came out, Rangoli said that Taapsee and Bhumi were not appropriate for the characters.

Taapsee is yet to comment on the recent tweet by Kangana’s team.

Also Read: Team Kangana Ranaut refutes reports of being summoned by Mumbai Police on Sushant Singh Rajput’s case